Beware of the carbon cowboys!
By Hans Nilsson / Published on Wed, 2007-05-02 07:00The Financial Times has issued a warning that the interest in (and necessity for) action in order to stop climate change is also creating a Wild West with carbon-offsetting cowboys! This is an important warning indeed!
As has been mentioned on this site before, there is a risk that many of the concerned people, who may have more money than experience and judgement attract less serious companies who make use of the situation.
The main problems as listed by FT are:
-
Pure fraud (the project does not exist)
-
No additionality (the offset would have happened anyway)
-
Double counting (the same object is sold many times)
Does it not sound like the plot from a Wild West movie?
It is, however, good that there is a focus on such attempts that stop them getting away too easily. The carbon sheriff, Al Gore, just denounced the Canadian climate plan as a fraud. Harsh words, but better now than when it is too late.
Tagged with
Rating
People who read this also read
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors







Comments
a fourth one
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Wed, 2007-05-02 8:21I would add a fourth problem, even when avoiding the previous three: the cost of carbon is a market price, driven by supply and demand, but also by the strength of the regulatory framework. The EU's ETS, with its high penalty for non-compliance (100 euro/tonne in phase 2) is a strong driver. The voluntary market much less so. There is no guarantee that the CO2 price is cost-reflective, and hence purchasing a carbon offset for a tonne of CO2 emissions may offset only a fraction of a tonne in reality.
This being said, there are a lot of good projects in the voluntary market, executed against high standards, and the FT's coverage has been - shall we say - selective.
Reply