Blue Energy

By Frederik Groeman / Published on Tue, 2007-10-23 16:43

Frederik Groeman & Kees van den Ende, KEMA

When a river runs into the ocean and fresh water mixes with saltwater, huge amounts of energy are unleashed. Unlike violent torrents in a waterfall or steaming hot geysers, the energy released cannot easily be seen from the banks of the estuary. Nevertheless, the energy is there, and everyone who has tried to separate salt from seawater knows that large amounts of energy are needed.

There are several ways to harvest energy from the entropy of mixing fresh or river water with salt or sea water. The two most important ways, pressure-retarded osmosis (PRO) and reverse electrodialysis (RED), depend heavily on membrane development and a reduction in the price per square meter.

Over the last twenty years, membrane technology has become more and more important in areas such as waste water treatment, desalination and drinking water preparation, resulting in a great reduction in prices. This has strongly supported the breakthrough of saline power, the brand name for PRO developed by Statkraft in Norway in 1998, and Blue Energy, under which name KEMA in the Netherlands started the development of the RED variant in 2002.

Starting with some historical notes, Van’t Hoff’s Nobel Prize in 1899 will be described, including the physical-chemical principles. Then the current technical status and challenges will be discussed. This will include the key topic, membranes, but also other issues such as pump energy, water pre-treatment, etc. Consideration will also be given to the potential energy production in delta areas and industrial sites. This will include the necessary electrical infrastructure for Blue Energy, which generates DC power and low voltage output.

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
Tagged with

Comments

reader question

By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Mon, 2008-04-07 19:36

For a case study on potential renewable energy sources in Zeeland, I had in mind to put a energyplant at the side of the Philipsdam. In your paper you talk about a plant with the typical size of a seacontainer (chapter 6, forelast lines). What size would this seacontainer have? Furthermore there is quite some eleboration on a lake at the Afsluitdijk. Is this just to give an example or do you think it would also be possible to build something like this in Zeeland?

Reply

For a location to be

By Kees van den Ende / Published on Mon, 2008-04-14 21:46

For a location to be suitable for Blue Energy, either based on PRO (pressure retarded osmosis) or RED (reverse electro dialysis), it is important to know

  • what the salt concentration difference is and
  • how much water flows.

A difference in concentration is better defined in case you have a physical "border" like a dam, such as the Philips dam. In the current situation the salt concentration difference on the two sites of the dam is, to my knowledge, low.

Normally the flow of the fresh water is the limiting factor. Of course, a limited outlet of the fresh water through a pipe is easier to handle through an installation then an open connection such as a river flowing into the sea.

Most of the fresh water running into the sea in the Netherlands passes through the rivers "Schelde", "Maas" and "Rijn" ending all in the Dutch Delta area, where the Province of Zeeland is located.

In the beginning of 2003 in the Dutch project "Blue Energy" KEMA and VWS developed the concept of installing the membrane installation for RED in modules of stacks inside a sea container. This was not only on basis of the low price of the sea containers, almost a commodity, but also anticipated on the easy handling infrastructure for sea containers. Handling cost can be substantial for a membrane installation, which are expected to have limited service life.

I hope this will help the case study of Mark

Many Greetings Kees van den Ende

Reply