The Chaotic World of Climate Truth
By Bruno De Wachter / Published on Fri, 2006-12-08 08:30Further reading
Is climate change excessively dramatised?
On the BBC News website, Mike Hulme, Director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, warns that presenting climate change as ‘catastrophic’, ‘chaotic’, and ‘irreversible’, could cause more harm than good.
The debate between climate change scientists and climate sceptics has shifted towards a debate between climate change scientists and climate alarmists. The latter speak about the ‘irreversible tipping in the Earth’s climate’. But according to Hulme, ‘the IPCC scenarios of future climate change — between 1.4 and 5.8 °C by 2100 — are significant enough without invoking catastrophe and chaos as unguided weapons’.
He sees two major dangers of such catastrophe discourse. Firstly, ‘the language of fear and terror is an ever-weakening vehicle for effective communication’. Just as with most drugs, people tend to need more and more to achieve the same effect or impact. Secondly, actions should be taken based on objective, scientific data; otherwise the cure may be worse than the disease.
Tagged with
Rating
Related content
- - Do you expect the USA enter into the international agreement succeeding the Kyoto protocol?
- - Major global companies make a (conditional) climate call.
- - Financial advisors line up for sustainable business
- - Germany energy policy - from the left pocket to the right?
- - Voluntary Carbon Offsets - still a long way to go
People who read this also read
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors






