Energy Efficiency

Subscribe to information alerts
Enter your email address in the box below


Energy Efficiency
Energy Technology
Our privacy pledge
xxxxxx

Energy efficiency is said to be "the cheapest form of energy we can get" and a great opportunity towards sustainability and environmental protection. Efficient and clean technology is many times available and needs to be leveraged.

The objective of this project is to allow easy access to knowledge and to facilitate the development of new initiatives developing, delivering or promoting energy efficient technology.

A superconducting hydrogen-electricity grid

Submitted by Bruno De Wachter on Tue, 2007-02-06 10:44.

The grid of the future?

The idea of a superconducting grid is not new. But the increasing pressure on existing high-voltage transmission grids and recent large power outages in the U.S. and Europe has brought it into the spotlight again.

Two American scientists, Paul M. Grant and Chauncey Starr, have designed a Super Cable, a superconducting conduit cooled by hydrogen that can simultaneously deliver electrical power and hydrogen fuel. The cable contains a pair of DC superconducting wires at +/- 50 kV carrying 50 kA, a current far higher than in a conventional wire. Such a cable could carry approximately 5 GW over several hundred kilometres at nearly zero resistance. Since the cable carries hydrogen as its cryogenic coolant, it has the double advantage of transporting energy in chemical as well as in electrical form.

Boosting renewables and hybrid vehicles

Such a Super Grid could significantly strengthen the current high-voltage grid. It would enable the transport of large amounts of electrical power from remote renewable or nuclear energy power stations. Power stations would not only put electrical power onto the grid, but also operate an electrolysis plant to produce hydrogen. The rise and fall of the output of renewable energy power stations could be compensated by a shift in the electricity/hydrogen blend produced. Such a Super Grid could also dramatically reduce fuel costs for a future transport sector based on electric- and hydrogen-powered hybrid vehicles.

Safety, reliability and investment cost are barriers

A prototype of such a Super Cable still has to be built. One of the main technical challenges is how to ensure the environmental safety and the reliability of the grid when a Super Grid cable fails. No circuit-breakers for such high currents exist at present and an extremely large power surge would instantaneously have to run through other lines. Moreover, the explosive potential of hydrogen requires an absolute hermetic seal of the line. Another barrier to overcome is that the investment costs will probably be enormous and beyond the timescale that is typically attractive to private investment.

Reference

Article 'A Power Grid for the Hydrogen Economy' in the Scientific American

A few comments on a harebrained scheme

When is there ever a need to transmit 5 GW from one particular point of an electricity grid to another – remote – discrete point? And how shall this boost the use of hybrid vehicles? How much energy is needed for liquefying the hydrogen? What happens when the use of hydrogen stalls at the end of this miracle cable? The cable will gradually warm up and finally burst. In order to avoid this, safety valves will have to open and probably burn the expensive but momentarily superfluous hydrogen. So this system requires a more or less stable flow of hydrogen through the cable – independently of the electrical load! I see no opportunity for a shift in the electricity / hydrogen blend because the need for cooling is constant.

Surely it is possible to build such cable and use it in a grid infrastructure that produces and transmits a part of its energy as electricity and the other part as hydrogen. Sure it may boost the electrical energy efficiency from 99% to 100% thanks to the use of a superconductor – if you ignore the cooling energy demand. But the hydrogen part of this system will operate at an overall efficiency of less than 50%. Is this more efficient than a plain expansion of the existing electrical system?

Surely the HV and EHV grids need expansion, but the point is not enhancing the power rating of the individual line but making the mesh denser! We need more lines, not stronger lines. And if we do, mind that doubling the use of copper in a DC line at a given voltage halves the losses, so there is a theoretically endless scope for loss reduction, should future energy prices justify this.

Where should the dramatic reduction of fuel costs for a future transport sector based on electric- and hydrogen-powered hybrid vehicles arise from? Suitable batteries for electric cars are still lacking, and the efficiencies of hydrogen engines perform poorer than diesels, adding to the poor conversion efficiency of electricity into hydrogen compared to refining mineral oil into petrol and diesel fuel.

There are several splendid applications for superconductors:

  • Short-circuit current limiters,
  • Magnetic energy storage (to mitigate voltage dips substantially),
  • extremely strong magnets used in medical diagnosis and particle accelerators.

These applications are unique to superconductors because they are impossible to implement with any other conductor. Another sector, where the superconductor is not really indispensable but useful, is propulsion motors and alternators on ships, where they can save substantial amounts of volume and weight. A special advantage of the specific system is that in case the superconductivity quenches on account of a fault, the copper hull takes the electric current over and enables the ship to still operate at 10% of its rated power.

Not an engineer, but..

I believe that in the long term, the discussion regarding the benefits of shifting away from a petroleum-based infrastructure needs to be framed not in terms of cost, which trends downward as technology is developed, but in terms of the ultimate necessity of ending our dependence on oil, which, regardless of your beliefs on greenhouse gases, geopolitics, or anything else, is inherently a finite supply.

As for questions of efficiency, diesels have been around for over a hundred years, and have thus had plenty of time and money poured into their development. It seems reasonable to assume that, given investment, research, and an infrastructure which allows for increased demand, hydrogen engines might be able to come into their own in terms of cost vs. efficiency.

The demand/cooling problem: couldn't the hydrogen conduit be constructed in some sort of loop with bleeder valves so that end users could just "tap" the supply when it was needed? Eventually it would have to be re-cooled, but this would at least prevent overheating. The cooling apparatus could even be powered by excess hydrogen, yes?

I can't speak to the need, today, of moving such vast amounts of energy around. However, wouldn't the ability to transport huge amounts of electrical energy over extremely long distances be an excellent means of globalizing the marketplace for local energy producers? This is, of course, assuming they are meeting domestic demand. Imagine the market for energy in developing nations, and the possible benefit to the environment if this demand could be satisfied without oil- or coal-based power. As energy demands are constantly increasing, the idea of overhauling the grid should be to them for years to come, and not just for the immediate future.

As for the energy cost in cooling the hydrogen, this could be the achilles heel of the whole endeavor, but as I am not an engineer (as previously stated), I have no idea what the numbers involved are. I certainly believe, however, that the idea merits stronger consideration than to just be dismissed out of hand as an impossibility.