Not a "Global Warming" rant
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Mon, 2007-03-26 22:24
This is not going to be rant on the global warming movement, nor a rant on its believers and non-believers. But by now, you probably have heard about Channel 4's 'The Global Warming Swindle':
According to a group of scientists brought together by documentary-maker Martin Durkin, if the planet is heating up, it isn't your fault and there's nothing you can do about it. We've almost begun to take it for granted that climate change is a man-made phenomenon. But just as the environmental lobby think they've got our attention, a group of naysayers have emerged to slay the whole premise of global warming.
Watching it reminded me of a passage in Kenneth Deffeyes book 'Beyond Oil' where he talks the hard complexity of environmental science, and how it attracts only a few students at Princeton:
Understanding environmental interactions involves some of the most difficult issues in engineering, chemistry, physics and computer science. Regrettably, many environmental students aren't interested in the hard stuff; they want to influence policy. This emphasis occurs in a wide range of colleges. As an example, at Princeton we have an endowment to support 'a Freshman Seminar in environmental studies, exploring environmental issues primarily through literary, philosophical, ethical, spiritual, or other humanistic perspectives.' We have elevated scientific ignorance to an art form.
Tagged with
Rating
People who read this also read
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors








Comments
unfair but not harmful
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Fri, 2008-07-25 22:55In the most recent episode of this saga, the UK's Office of Communication has ruled the documentary unfair in its portrayal of scientists and the IPCC, but not harmful to the public.
Reply