- home
- topics
- blogs
- library
- eLibrary
- application guide
- documents
- EPQU
- EPQU Journal - Vol 11 Issue 1
- EPQU Journal - Vol 11 Issue 2
- EPQU Journal - Vol 12 Issue 1
- EPQU Journal - Vol 12 Issue 2
- EPQU Journal Vol 13 Issue 1
- EPQU Magazine - Vol 1 Issue 1
- EPQU Magazine - Vol 1 Issue 2
- EPQU Magazine - Vol 2 Issue 1
- EPQU Magazine - Vol 2 Issue 2
- Call for Papers
- EPQU Conference 2007
- Popular EPQU articles
- Title index
- image galleries
- energy links
- open access resources
- directory
- elearning
- service
- projects
Eco-Sheet Gas vs Electrical Heating
Submitted by Sergio Ferreira on Fri, 2007-09-21 11:42.
Concerns about CO2 and climate change are greater than ever. Residential heating is responsible for a considerable part of CO2 emissions that go into our atmosphere.
The objective of this case study is to compare the environmental impact of a heating system using a gas conventional boiler and other using electrical heaters at the point of use. The simulations were made taking into account the conditions for a normal house and a low energy house. Several electricity generation mixes were also used in order to assess the impact of electrical heating in different countries.
The results show that electrical heating has great advantages when clean electricity generation is in place, e.g. using renewable energy sources or nuclear energy.
- Add new comment
- Eco-Sheet_Gas_vs_Electrical_Heating.pdf (1595 downloads | 88.45 KB)
- Printer-friendly version
- 8917 reads
Related Content
- Eco-sheet: 15 kW induction motor – impact of efficiency increase varies with electricity mix
- Managing Risks in Ageing Networks: a Case Study
- Ten business opportunities for the electrical contracting sector
- Environmental Effects of Electricity Generation
- Eco-sheet: Upgrading the overhead line of DC railways


the spirit of electricity future
There are certain elements not taken into account in the study, which we will probably never be able to take into account:
A few cost benchmarks for the Belgian construction market
Oil heating
Gas heating
Heat pump
Electric heating
taking an integrated view
Sergio:
2 further considerations:
eco-sheet for heating
Neither gas boilers nor electric resistance heating...
Dear Sergio
This is an interesting topic. In my group we have investigated this issue a few years ago and wrote a paper published in the Journal Energy and Buildings, November, 2003. Available here: doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.11.003
Its not only the energy carrier, but also the conversion technology which is the decisive factor.
In my opinion neither makes sense electric resistance heating, nor gas boilers. It is just not the fuel cycle. Gas will become increasingly less available...
The solution is (after all cost-effective improvements have been made to the building envelope) to use either biomass and/or high (significantly higher than 3) COP heat pumps.
In my home I have heat pumps with a nominal COP of 4.3, meaning that the seasonal average value is probably larger than 5. Gas boilers become hopelessly wasteful by comparison.
comparing comfort levels
Since gas and electricity are priced differently as energy carriers, it is plausible that consumers will set their heating systems to a higher comfort level for the lower priced energy source. After all, the economic law of demand still applies - lower price = higher demand.
Very interesting approach,
Very interesting approach, Hans, it's hard to argue your statement, but I'll try to do it. I don't thing this economical model will remain the same for the future as we have to consider other advantages and disadvantages as well. Normally low price=high demand but we are also facing the global warming that has a hard word to say here. The way I see things there will be many changes in a very short time and people should comply with new norm... These changes will definitely have major implications over electrical energy as well.
Heating Service Los Angeles
higher demand = higher price...
aggregate versus individual demand
It's important to distinguish individual & aggregate demand. An individual consumer has probably a quite inelastic (downward sloping) demand curve, so the demand increase from the lower price of gas versus electric heating (per kWh) is likely to be low, unless the price becomes so low that the consumer stops caring.
The current rise in energy prices is probably due to an income effect on the aggregate demand curve, pushing prices up the supply curve. At least that's what the conventional theory says.
But in this context, let's also remember a quote that Amery Lovins likes to use: "The technical and implementation options -- the everyday work of energy efficiency practitioners -- are mostly unknown, however, to those econometricians who lie awake nights worrying about whether what works in practice can possibly work in theory."
Thermal and electric uses to be assessed with different profiles
Profile from energy carrier depends on use : Electrical heating is mostly used in winter periods with peaks in the morning and in the evening.So the power generation mix to be used is neither base-load nor average mix, but rather semi-base or peak power generation.
As an example, a newly installed electrical heating in France would typically use electricity generated by a mix of 67 % natural gas (combined cycle + gas turbines), 10 % oil, 13 % coal, and only 10 % nuclear.
The CO2 emissions for electrical heating will be around 600 g CO2/kWhe, which is more than twice the emissions from gas heating with a condensing boiler.
environmental performance not inherent
Thanks Jacques for your comment. This is a consequence from electrical system operation which we are discussing in the future power systems group.
In low energy dwellings, the heat demand can be postponed quite easily without affecting comfort level, so that it does not need to take place during peak demand.
Using accumulation heating, it should be possible to acquire the daily heat budget at base load (or periods of high wind & no electricity demand).
ban in Denmark abolished for low-energy buildings
Interestingly, the national energy efficiency action plan for Denmark (p12) mentions that for low-energy buildings, the ban on electric heating will be lifted. Also the requirement to connect to district heating or natural gas systems will no longer apply in this case.
This corroborates the point of this article, that for low and ultra-low energy dwellings, the heating systems may be quite different from today's.