Eco-sheet Gas vs Electrical Heating
By Sergio Ferreira / Published on Fri, 2007-09-21 11:42
Concerns about CO2 and climate change are greater than ever. Residential heating is responsible for a considerable part of CO2 emissions that go into our atmosphere.
The objective of this case study is to compare the environmental impact of a heating system using a gas conventional boiler and other using electrical heaters at the point of use. The simulations were made taking into account the conditions for a normal house and a low energy house. Several electricity generation mixes were also used in order to assess the impact of electrical heating in different countries.
The results show that electrical heating has great advantages when clean electricity generation is in place, e.g. using renewable energy sources or nuclear energy.
Tagged with
Rating
Related content
- - Eco-sheet: 1 kWh generated using different energy sources
- - The Power of Electricity - Can it save energy and CO2 emissions
- - Eco-sheet: 15 kW induction motor – impact of efficiency increase varies with electricity mix
- - Eco-sheet: Upgrading the overhead line of DC railways
- - Evaluating Environmental Performance in Low-Carbon Energy Systems
People who read this also read
- - Evaluating Environmental Performance in Low-Carbon Energy Systems
- - Energy Efficiency in the Food and Beverages Industry
- - Energy is main topic in the 'Grand Challenges of Engineering'
- - In Memoriam - Jonathan Manson
- - Concentrated Solar Thermal Power - Training course on Technology in 5 lessons
- - Case 3 - Low Energy House vs Passive House
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors








Comments
the spirit of electricity future
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Thu, 2007-09-27 22:43There are certain elements not taken into account in the study, which we will probably never be able to take into account:
Reply
A few cost benchmarks for the Belgian construction market
By Benoit Dome / Published on Thu, 2007-10-04 12:56Oil heating
Gas heating
Heat pump
Electric heating
Reply
taking an integrated view
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Mon, 2007-10-22 13:11Sergio:
2 further considerations:
Reply
eco-sheet for heating
By Benoit Dome / Published on Mon, 2007-10-22 22:28 the submitted costs or budget don't actually included various points for discussion eg gain of space, thickness of the floor gained in the case of renovation, ... we have to try to make a good list regarding all those topics and review it regarding construction and environemental viewsReply
Neither gas boilers nor electric resistance heating...
By Anibal T de Almeida / Published on Fri, 2007-10-26 11:03Dear Sergio
This is an interesting topic. In my group we have investigated this issue a few years ago and wrote a paper published in the Journal Energy and Buildings, November, 2003. Available here: doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2003.11.003
Its not only the energy carrier, but also the conversion technology which is the decisive factor.
In my opinion neither makes sense electric resistance heating, nor gas boilers. It is just not the fuel cycle. Gas will become increasingly less available...
The solution is (after all cost-effective improvements have been made to the building envelope) to use either biomass and/or high (significantly higher than 3) COP heat pumps.
In my home I have heat pumps with a nominal COP of 4.3, meaning that the seasonal average value is probably larger than 5. Gas boilers become hopelessly wasteful by comparison.
Reply
comparing comfort levels
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Thu, 2007-11-08 15:44Since gas and electricity are priced differently as energy carriers, it is plausible that consumers will set their heating systems to a higher comfort level for the lower priced energy source. After all, the economic law of demand still applies - lower price = higher demand.
Reply
Very interesting approach,
By gordman / Published on Fri, 2007-11-23 15:36Very interesting approach, Hans, it's hard to argue your statement, but I'll try to do it. I don't thing this economical model will remain the same for the future as we have to consider other advantages and disadvantages as well. Normally low price=high demand but we are also facing the global warming that has a hard word to say here. The way I see things there will be many changes in a very short time and people should comply with new norm... These changes will definitely have major implications over electrical energy as well.
Heating Service Los Angeles
Reply
higher demand = higher price...
By Sergio Ferreira / Published on Wed, 2008-01-02 11:22 Hans, I agree that in some cases low price = higher demand, however, we can find many examples where a higher price is the result of a higher demand. In the particular case of energy (in a broad sense), that applies! Maybe price is still a conditioning factor in our energy options, but the environmental concern, the hurdle are other factors that have a high weigh in our decision nowadays... I live in an all electrical house. It was not my choice, but it is very practical, safe, and provides me a high level of comfort. In the future, if I have to choose, I will probably choose an all electrical system again, instead of having an electrical installation plus a biomass boiler plus a gas cooker! One contract, one invoice, less hurdle, more comfort and safety. And with the increase of green electricity, probably far less environmental impacts.Reply
aggregate versus individual demand
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Thu, 2008-01-24 12:01It's important to distinguish individual & aggregate demand. An individual consumer has probably a quite inelastic (downward sloping) demand curve, so the demand increase from the lower price of gas versus electric heating (per kWh) is likely to be low, unless the price becomes so low that the consumer stops caring.
The current rise in energy prices is probably due to an income effect on the aggregate demand curve, pushing prices up the supply curve. At least that's what the conventional theory says.
But in this context, let's also remember a quote that Amery Lovins likes to use: "The technical and implementation options -- the everyday work of energy efficiency practitioners -- are mostly unknown, however, to those econometricians who lie awake nights worrying about whether what works in practice can possibly work in theory."
Reply
Thermal and electric uses to be assessed with different profiles
By Jacques Dubost / Published on Thu, 2008-01-03 18:53Profile from energy carrier depends on use : Electrical heating is mostly used in winter periods with peaks in the morning and in the evening.So the power generation mix to be used is neither base-load nor average mix, but rather semi-base or peak power generation.
As an example, a newly installed electrical heating in France would typically use electricity generated by a mix of 67 % natural gas (combined cycle + gas turbines), 10 % oil, 13 % coal, and only 10 % nuclear.
The CO2 emissions for electrical heating will be around 600 g CO2/kWhe, which is more than twice the emissions from gas heating with a condensing boiler.
Reply
environmental performance not inherent
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Thu, 2008-01-24 11:36Thanks Jacques for your comment. This is a consequence from electrical system operation which we are discussing in the future power systems group.
In low energy dwellings, the heat demand can be postponed quite easily without affecting comfort level, so that it does not need to take place during peak demand.
Using accumulation heating, it should be possible to acquire the daily heat budget at base load (or periods of high wind & no electricity demand).
Reply
ban in Denmark abolished for low-energy buildings
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Thu, 2008-01-24 11:40Interestingly, the national energy efficiency action plan for Denmark (p12) mentions that for low-energy buildings, the ban on electric heating will be lifted. Also the requirement to connect to district heating or natural gas systems will no longer apply in this case.
This corroborates the point of this article, that for low and ultra-low energy dwellings, the heating systems may be quite different from today's.
Reply