EEStor's high performance ultracapacitors
By Bruno De Wachter / Published on Wed, 2007-02-28 08:30Game-changing technology or Much Ado About Nothing?
There have been a lot of rumours flying around the energy sector lately about EEStor, a secretive Texas start-up. True: if EEStor can reach its ambitious goal of replacing the electrochemical battery with high performance ultracapacitors, that would indeed be a major breakthrough in the energy sector. The technology has the potential to radically change transport systems, offset the intermittency problem of some renewable energy power generators, and improve the stability of power grids.
But we’re not that far yet. Most specialists are very sceptical, warning that what EEStor aims at is too good to be true. They have not proven anything yet and some of the technical difficulties seem insurmountable at this point.
Capacitor with high specific energy
The major advantage of ultracapacitors compared to electrochemical batteries is that they can absorb and release power in a very short time and in a virtually endless cycle with little degradation. Their big drawback up to now is that the energy they can store is 25 times less per kilogram than electrochemical batteries. EEStor now claims that it can make a ceramic ultracapacitor with a barium-titanate dielectric that can store 280 watt hours per kilogram. If true, this is more than double the 120 watt hours per kilogram of a lithium-ion battery.
Difficulties to overcome
It has been known for years that barium-titanate powder, if very pure, can have an extremely high permittivity — EEStor cites a permittivity of 18,500 (compared to 20 or 30 for a traditional ultracapacitor dielectric). But before barium-titanate ultracapacitors can be used in cars or devices, a few critical difficulties are still waiting to be solved:
-
Purity. The barium-titanate powder needs to be extremely pure. How will this be done on a mass-production scale?
-
Temperature. The performance of the barium-titanate dielectric is dependent on temperature; it won’t work at low temperatures.
-
Mechanical strength. The ceramic structure is brittle by nature, and will quickly develop microfractures caused by the thermal stress. This will lead to premature failure.
-
Leakage. The system requires a high voltage (3,500 V), however high-voltage capacitors self-discharge quickly. That means that the cars or devices would need to be recharged regularly even if they are not used.
-
Safety. What happens if a car with a 3,500 V energy system crashes?
EEStor has not stated how they propose to overcome these difficulties. But they are claiming to be on track for producing an energy-storage system for electric vehicles weighing less than 50 kilograms, allowing a 300-kilometers driving range, and able to recharge in less than 10 minutes.
If true, it would not be the first time in history that a seemingly impossible technological breakthrough becomes reality, but it also would not be the first time that there has been Much Ado About Nothing for attracting investors to a technological start-up. We will just have to wait and see.
Tagged with
Rating
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors







Comments
See also
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Fri, 2007-03-02 13:33 A commentary from After Gutenberg, giving some more background, and history.Reply
not really worried
By Stefan Fassbinder / Published on Tue, 2007-07-24 22:29The statement by Indie sounds reasonable: My Li ion PC battery does about 150Wh/kg. 280Wh/kg does not appear as a quantum leap compared to this. The volume will be about the same, since accumulator batteries are very heavy (in terms of density).
I only would not bother so much about the voltage. We also operate locomotives at 15kV and 25 kV. The railway carriage heating is supplied with 1.5kV or 3kV. And for the standardising experts everything above 50V DC and 120V AC is dangerous by definition, so it does not really matter so much whether you protect people against touching 230V or 3000V. In the case of a crash the risk is more the fire hazard arising from short-circuits rather than electric shock, and the short-circuit currents are lower with higher voltages.
Reply
safety
By supermaster / Published on Wed, 2008-06-04 12:17 Let's asume that is it all true and there will really be small and light 50kWh ultracaps possible. 50kWh is a lot, a lot energy and the problem is it is not chemical energy, but it is electro-static energy. Imagine an ultracap-car accident and imagine that the ultracap is damaged. I see no other possibillity than it will self-discharge, because the only thing that holds those two oposite electic charges separated is very, very good dielectic with absolutly no conductivity. When damaged, it is inevitable that those two important characteristics will be changed. lets count: 50kWh of energy discharded in one minute is no less than 3MW (50kW*60) of wattage. If it would be 10s, it is 18MW (50kW*60*6). I fear that even very small demage of dielectic will lead to chain-damage of surrounding dielectic because od tremendous heat it will generate. 18MW in 4571 sq inches will evaporate whole ultracap in moments thus accelerating discharge. So maybe if will take only seconds to melt down all ultracap and when melted-wapored, it will self-discharge remaining energy immediately relesing remaining energy in huge explosion. When completly dischargen in one second, it is 180MW...that is some real explosion.Reply