Financial Risks for Investors in Regulated Transmission Systems

The financial risks in regulatory systems include the following.

  • In many countries regulatory price controls are set for five-year periods,
    whereas loans required to fund investment projects are taken out for much
    longer time frames. If the rates of return are not sufficiently adequate,
    the transmission system operators (TSOs) could face difficulty in raising
    the required funds.
  • Credit ratings of stand-alone transmission companies often fare better than
    companies that are subsidiaries of integrated players. Stand-alone transmission
    companies have a clear focus on transmission, regulated rates and have visible
    separation from other potentially volatile segments of the industry (eg. generation
    and supply). They are also immune to the credit issues which can affect integrated
    multinationals, who may be seen to be pursuing over-aggressive expansion in
    other markets.
  • Europe's transmission companies have a mix of ownership - some are state
    owned while others are private or subsidiaries of integrated companies. Public
    companies may be able to access equity as well as debt markets for capital,
    but state owned enterprises have more limited access to capital markets that
    can restrict investment plans.
  • Underground cable projects are more expensive up front than OHL. Grid companies
    will have a natural concern that regulators will be reluctant to allow full
    recovery of the higher incremental costs from customers. Also investment projects
    are not "ringed fenced" from a regulatory perspective. The projects
    are added to the "regulated asset base". In these cases, it is important
    for regulators to be persuaded of the consumer benefits of certain higher
    cost options, such as where underground cables assist in unblocking local
    protests against a new transmission project
  • The economics of investment into new long distance transmission infrastructure
    have to be weighed against the alternative of building new generation capacity.
    The lengthy consents process for new lines can often mean it is more attractive
    to build new power plants, even if this is not the optimum solution.

Log in to post comments

Follow us