Future Power Systems 3 - Main Plant characteristics
By Stephen Browning / Published on Wed, 2007-11-28 18:16Most thermal fossil fired generation is designed to be most efficient at full load. Large coal and oil units are typically 36% efficient at max ouput dropping to 32% at half load. CCGTs can be 55% efficient at maximum, but only 40% when at half load.

Max ramp rates are around 10MW/minute and other dynamic restrictions apply when operating thermal units - minimum stable generation, minimum run and shutdown times. In addition, each unit requires a miminum notice to synchronise and will consume start up heat to bring it on load. Both of these increase with the time the generator has been shut down.

The variations in the daily demand curve dictate that a number of generators start up for the plateau and peak periods of the day. Some demand rises are so fast (up to 3000MW/hhr in GB) that a number of units will be ramping simultaneously. At all times, some units are also part-loaded for response, reserve and spare duty, to cover unexpected demand or generation changes. Units have to be ordered far enough in advance that they will synchronise at the correct time
It is vital that the demand curve is accurately predicted and generation is reliably operated to avoid unneccessary part loading, allocation of excess reserve or ordering of generators that aren't actually needed in the event. Prediction, reliability and timing are the key to efficient operation.
The conventional power plant is designed to be controllable for instruction following. Thus, its output is predictable for the purpose of Generation-Demand matching. Even so, allowances have to be made to cover the risk of plant breakdown; response, reserve and spare output is carried to cover the anticipated level of generation shortfall and failure as against the instructed output.
Tagged with
Related content
- - Future Power Systems 2 - Matching - Monitoring and Predicting Generation and Demand
- - Future Power Systems 1 - the Balance principle, Frequency and the Grid
- - Future Power Systems 17 - DER Market and Matching
- - Future Power Systems 16 - Data standards, Metering and Settlement
- - Future Power Systems 15 - Data Logistics
Popular content
- - Checklist for the electrical installation in the home
- - Report - Renewables Support Schemes and Grid Integration Policies
- - Virtual earthing electrode
- - What percentage of which car type (total 100%) do you expect in Europe in 2050? And ditto for 2020 and 2030?
- - Intelligent control of network-connected convertors







Comments
future power systems
By arajarao / Published on Wed, 2007-12-12 2:37I wonder whether it would be possible to invite comments on 'frequency' in these discussions. In India we are using a frequency range for the system of 49-50.5 Hz as against a western country range of 49.95-50.05 Hz. The larger range is used to link to a variable energy rate called the UI (Unscheduled Interchange) rate. I am sure most Leonardo users would be familiar.
Reply
Frequency management
By Stephen Browning / Published on Mon, 2007-12-17 14:04 Thanks for the observation. I believe the frequency range can be even larger in some developed countries. It would be interesting to see what issues that gives with System and Generation stability and loading. The limits I quoted are indeed applicable in GB. Would this discussion go better under my article on Balancing and Frequency?? Regards, SteveReply
moving this discussion
By Hans De Keulenaer / Published on Wed, 2007-12-19 13:13 Indeed it's better to have this discussion at a different place. I've posted a reply there on availability based tariffs used in India to control frequency.Reply