Green Paper on Energy Efficiency

By HDK / Published on Fri, 2006-01-20 16:50

In the context of the public consultation on the Green Paper on Energy Efficiency, European Copper Institute (ECI) in cooperation with WWF's European Policy Office have organised a series of 7 informal discussions via webconferences. Each conference focussed on a specific theme, and discussed a number of questions in the consultation.

Session 7: Buildings and systems

January 20, 2006

Presentations

  • Introduction, European Copper Institute view
  • Rod Janssen, Energy Consultant view

Session 6: Fiscal policy and finance mechanisms

January 13, 2006

Presentations

  • Lorenzo Pagliano, Politecnico Milano view

Session 5: Outreach

December 9, 2005

Presentations

  • Introduction, European Copper Institute view
  • Hans Nilsson, 4-Fact view
  • Jean-Philippe Denruyter, WWF EPO view

Report

Discussion transcript view

Session 4: Regulation

November 9, 2005

Presentations

  • Introduction, European Copper Institute view
  • Hans Nilsson, 4-Fakt view
  • Mariangiola Fabbri, WWF EPO view

Session 3: Product Policy

October 19, 2005

Presentations

  • Introduction view
  • Benoit Lebot, UNDP view
  • A report from the Amsterdam Sustainable Energy Forum, Mariangiola Fabbri, WWF European Policy Office view

Report

Discussion transcript view

Session 2: R&D, technology deployment

September 28, 2005

Presentations

  • Przemyslaw Komarnicki view
  • Hans De Keulenaer, European Copper Institute view

Report

Discussion transcript view

Session 1: Gap analysis - what is missing in the Green Paper?

September 16, 2005

Presentations

  • Randall Bowie, European Commission view
  • Mariangiola Fabbri, WWF European Policy Office view
  • Hans De Keulenaer, European Copper Institute view

Report

Discussion transcript view

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Image CAPTCHA
Copy the characters (respecting upper/lower case) from the image.
Tagged with
Rating
3.5
Average: 3.5 (1 vote)
Your rating: None